1. 06 Nov, 2014 12 commits
  2. 05 Nov, 2014 19 commits
  3. 04 Nov, 2014 9 commits
    • Min Si's avatar
      Add req RMA op tests checking local completion. · db61d8d8
      Min Si authored
      Rput/accumulate + wait guarantees local completion, which means we can
      modify local buffer after wait is finished. These two tests check the local
      completion of Rput and Raccumulate by modifying local buffer after wait
      and then checking remote data. We expect the remote data should be equal
      to the local data before modifying.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarXin Zhao <xinzhao3@illinois.edu>
    • Min Si's avatar
      Bug-fix: trigger OnFinal at end when receiving multiple segments. · ea444c34
      Min Si authored
      There are two request handlers used when receiving data:
      (1) OnDataAvail, which is triggered when data is arrived;
      (2) OnFinal, which is triggered when receiving data is finished;
      In progress engine, only OnDataAvail is triggered when a request is
      completed. The upper ch3 layer should change OnDataAvail to OnFinal when
      the coming receiving data will complete the request.
      However, in the original implementation, when receiving multiple
      segments for a large receive data, the OnDataAvail was reset to 0
      at the last segment hence the final action was lost. This patch fixed
      this bug.
      In RMA target put/acc/gacc packet handlers, OnDataAvail was reset to
      OnFinal function if OnDataAvail is 0 due to this bug. This patch also
      rewrites this part so that packet handlers only sets proper OnFinal
      handler at beginning and let the receiving data function change
      OnDataAvail to OnFinal at the last segment.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarXin Zhao <xinzhao3@illinois.edu>
    • Min Si's avatar
      Implement true request-based RMA operations. · 3e005f03
      Min Si authored
      There are two requests associated with each request-based
      operation: one normal internal request (req) and one newly
      added user request (ureq). We return ureq to user when
      request-based op call returns.
      The ureq is initialized with completion counter (CC) to 1
      and ref count to 2 (one is referenced by CH3 and another
      is referenced by user). If the corresponding op can be
      finished immediately in CH3, the runtime will complete ureq
      in CH3, and let user's MPI_Wait/Test to destroy ureq. If
      corresponding op cannot be finished immediately, we will
      first increment ref count to 3 (because now there are
      three places needed to reference ureq: user, CH3,
      progress engine). Progress engine will complete ureq when
      op is completed, then CH3 will release its reference during
      garbage collection, finally user's MPI_Wait/Test will
      destroy ureq.
      The ureq can be completed in following three ways:
      1. If op is issued and completed immediately in CH3
      (req is NULL), we just complete ureq before free op.
      2. If op is issued but not completed, we remember the ureq
      handler in req and specify OnDataAvail / OnFinal handlers
      in req to a newly added request handler, which will complete
      user reqeust. The handler is triggered at three places:
         2-a. when progress engine completes a put/acc req;
         2-b. when get/getacc handler completes a get/getacc req;
         2-c. when progress engine completes a get/getacc req;
      3. If op is not issued (i.e., wait for lock granted), the 2nd
      way will be eventually performed when such op is issued by
      progress engine.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarXin Zhao <xinzhao3@illinois.edu>
    • Junchao Zhang's avatar
      Uncomment some code in F08 since the cce bug is fixed · 73859c0e
      Junchao Zhang authored
      It was commented out due to a cce/8.3.0 bug. Since the bug is fixed in cce/8.3.2,
      we can safely uncomment the code.
      No reviewer
    • Kenneth Raffenetti's avatar
      portals4: create separate EQ for origin events · 5c1bd3d4
      Kenneth Raffenetti authored
      An EQ for origin events is useful for rate-limiting operations so that
      a process does not locally trigger a flow control event on its portal.
      We will implement the rate-limiting logic in the rportals layer.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAntonio J. Pena <apenya@mcs.anl.gov>
    • Kenneth Raffenetti's avatar
      portals4: create EQ using limit from NI init · c443c852
      Kenneth Raffenetti authored
      Rather than use an EQ limit that may be lower than the system default,
      just create our EQ using the returned maximum from PtlNIInit.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAntonio J. Pena <apenya@mcs.anl.gov>
    • Junchao Zhang's avatar
      Rename enum MPICH_WITHIN_MPI to MPICH_IN_INIT · 9ea630d0
      Junchao Zhang authored
      The new enum name is more descriptive to describle an MPIR_MPI_State_t
      that says MPICH is in initialization but not completely finished.
      Signed-off-by: Pavan Balaji's avatarPavan Balaji <balaji@anl.gov>
    • Junchao Zhang's avatar
      Make MPI_Initialized and friends thread-safe · 435ce800
      Junchao Zhang authored
      Implements MPI-Forum ticket 357 (https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/357
      The ticket will be included in MPI-3.1, which adds thread-safety to MPI_INITIALIZED,
      In MPICH, we make MPIR_Process.mpich_state atomic. After MPI is fully initialized, i.e.,
      in POST_INIT state, MPI_QUERY_THREAD, MPI_IS_THREAD_MAIN are inherently thread-safe.
      Fixes #2137
      Signed-off-by: Pavan Balaji's avatarPavan Balaji <balaji@anl.gov>
    • Junchao Zhang's avatar
      Code clean up for enum MPIR_MPI_State_t · dfb872fe
      Junchao Zhang authored
      Also remove numbering for each enum, which is not necessary and is
      hard to maintain.
      Signed-off-by: Pavan Balaji's avatarPavan Balaji <balaji@anl.gov>