Torus and simplewan each have problems precluding them from the current
scheduling fix:
- simplewan - each "device" has N input/output ports. It can't simply tell the
  scheduler when they are (it is?) idle because the scheduler doesn't know which
  packets go to which ports
- torus - also has N input/output ports (two for each dimension). Also, the same
  routing "queue" (via the "next_link_available_time" var) is used for incoming
  and outgoing messages, so we can't guarantee the scheduler that we'll be
  available at time x (an incoming msg could arrive and then be routed at time
  x-1). This isn't a problem for the dragonfly network as terminals aren't
  intermediate routers. Ideally what needs to happen here is for the
  intermediate packets/chunks to be queued up in the scheduler.